IMPLICATURE IN THE PROPOSAL MOVIE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v5i2.3944Keywords:
implicature, conventional implicature, conversational implicature, maxim, The ProposalAbstract
The purposes of this research were to find out all utterances by the main characters Margaret Tate and Andrew Paxton that contains implicature and its context in The Proposal movie. This research was categorized as qualitative research and used content analysis approach. The researcher used The Proposal (2006) movie as the source of data. The data were taken from the utterances between the main characters Margaret Tate and Andrew Paxton that contained implicature based on implicature theory by Grice and its context used context theory by Hymes. The findings reveal that the researcher got 23 data of conversational implicature and 14 data of conventional implicature. 15 data from 23 data of conversational implicature are done by Andrew. From the data that the researcher found, component of the context that prominent between Andrew and Margaret was participants. From 15 data of conversational implicature done by Andrew, the contexts of participant are vertical dimension. Vertical dimension is a component that relates to social factors such as age or social status. The seven data of this research were vertical dimension of social status between Margaret as a boss and Andrew as her assistant. Then, the other eight data were social status of both of Margaret and Andrew as a fake lover. The context of participant in this research became the benchmark for the researcher to find the implied meaning.
References
Calero, Henry H. (2005), The Power of Nonverbal Communication. USA: Silver Lake Publishing
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse:A resource book for student. USA: Routledge.
Farooq, U. (2015). Language Definition Characteristic and Importance in Communication.
Fletcher, A. (Director). (2009). The Proposal [Motion Picture].
Fraenkel, Jack R., and Norman E. Wallen. (2007), How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. 7th ed. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Gazdar, G. (1978). Pragmatics : Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
Gibbs, G. R., & Taylor, C. (2010, February 19). LEarning Qualitative Data Analysis on the Web. Retrieved October 12, 2017, from Online QDA : onlineqda.hud.ac.uk
Grice, H. P. (1991). Studies in the Way of Words. United States: Harvard University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
Hornby, A. S. (2006). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press
Huda, M. (2013). Conversational Implicature Found in Dialogue Euro Trip. Malang: Unpublished Writter.
Hymes, D. H. (1974). Foundation of Sociolinguistics : An Ethnography Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania press.
IMDb. (2009, June 9). Retrieved April 17, 2018, from The Proposal: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1041829/?ref_=nv_sr_1
Khusnita, A. S. (2013). The Implicature of Humor Utterances in Humor Lucu Ala Gus Dur. Semarang: Unpublished Writer.
Korrapati, D. R. (2016). Five Chapter Model for Research Thesis Writing: 108 Practical Lessons. India: Diamond Pocket Books Pvt Ltd.
Latta, R. L. (1999). The Basic Humor Process " A Cognitive- Shift Theory and The Case Against Incongruity". Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles in Pragmatics. New York: Routledge.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Macmillan Dictionary (2009). Retrieved February 1, 2020 from on your knees: https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/on-your-knees
Mayer, C. F. (2009). Introducing English Linguistics. New York: Cambridge UNiversity Press.
Mey, J. L. (1983). Pragmatics An Introduction. United States: Blackwell.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. California: SAGE Publications.
Miller, K. (2002). Communication Theories: persperctive, process, and context. New York: McGraw Hill.
Pogoni, A. (2013, May 24-25). Illocutionary Force Indicating Defice (IFID) Mood in Albanian Language. The 1st International Conference on Research and Education , 1-10.
Searle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionarry Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research. New York: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Thao, V. T. (2011). A Study of Conversational Implicatures in TITANIC Film. Danang: Unpublished Writer.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Every work in Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
