CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURE IN IN THE HEART OF THE SEA MOVIE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v5i2.3380Keywords:
Pragmatics, conversational implicature, In The Heart of The Sea movieAbstract
This research aims to find out the types and the purposes of conversational implicature uttered by all characters in In The Heart of The Sea movie by using pragmatics approach. The design of this research is qualitative research employing content analysis approach that focused on textual investigation. The data of this research is utterances, which contains conversational implicature spoken by the characters in that movie. This research has one data source which is the movie script of In The Heart of The Sea movie. The data of this research are categorized as types of conversational implicature are analyzed based on Grice’s theory (1975) and the purposes of conversational implicature used theory by Brown and Levinson (1978). The result of this research shows that two types of conversational implicature are found in the utterances of the characters in that movie, they are particularized conversational implicature and generalized conversational implicature. Five purposes of conversational implicature also found in this research, they are to protect speaker itself, to show power and politeness, to give information, to entertain the audiences (humorous) and to have lack specific information.
References
Armstrong, Elizabeth;. (2011). Langauge, meaning, context, and functional communication. Edith Cowan University: ECU Publications.
Brown, P.; Levinson, S.C.;. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.
Cambridge: Cambridge Univercity Press.
Bublitz, W. & Andreas H. J. (eds.) 2010. Handbooks of Pragmatics. New York:Walter de
Gruyter.
Chaleunvong, K. (2009). Data Collection Techniques. Vientiane.
Denzin, Norman K.; Lincoln, Yvonna S.;. (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Diningrum, Arista; Musyahda, Lilla;. (2016). Conversational Implicature in "Sarah Sechan" Talk Show of Go Green Episodes. Anglicist, 18-23.
Fauziyah, Nadya Alfi;. (2016). Conversational Implicature on The Chew Talk Show. Malang: Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University.
Gazdar, Gerald;. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, Pressupotition, and Logic Form. New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H. Paul;. (1975). Logic and Conversation, in P. Cole and J.L. Morgan eds, Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3. New York : Academic Press
Griffiths, Patrick. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. New York: Edinburgh University Press.
Grundy, Peter;. (2000). Doing Pragmatics. USA: Oxford University Press Inc.
Hassan, Afrah; Jabbar, Amani;. (2018). Functions of Language. University of Al-Qadissiya.
Horn, Laurance R; Ward, Gregory;. (2006). Pragmatics. USA: Blackwell Publishing.
Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang., & Shannon, E. Sarah. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 1277-1288.
Lakoff, R. (1993). The limits of politeness : Therapeutic and classroom discourse. Multilingua 8: 101-29
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983).Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Martini, A. (2018). Conversational implicature of Indonesian students in daily communication. Indonesian EFL Journal, 4(1), 93-100
Mason, Jennifer;. (2002). Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Miles, B. Mathew., &Huberman, A. Michael. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. United Kingdom: SAGE Publication.
Nunan, D. 1993. Introducing Discourse Analysis. : Penguin Group.
Rahayu, Endry Sri;. (2016). Types of Implicature in Informal Conversations Used by The English Education Study Program Students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 65-83.
Siregar, Rahmat Fuad;. (2018). An Analysis of Conversational Implicature in V for Vendetta Movie. Universitas Sumatra Utara.
Thomas, Jenny;. (2013). Meaning in Interaction: An introduction to Pragmatics. New York: Routledge.
Tribus, Angela C.;. (2017). The Communicative Functions of Language: An Exploration of Roman Jakobson's Theory in TESOL. SIT Graduate Institute: MA TESOL Collection.
Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yule, George. (2006). The Study of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Every work in Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
