TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI DALAM UJARAN KEBENCIAN PADA BALASAN TWEET @SAFARINASWIFTY: KAJIAN PRAGMATIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v4i4.4408Keywords:
tweet replies, pragmatics, illocutionary act, hate speechAbstract
This study uses hate speeches on the tweet replies of the account @safarinaswifty to be analyzed using pragmatics theory. This study aims to describe the forms as well as the types of the hate speech on @safarinaswifty tweet replies. This study is a library research with descriptive-qualitative approach. The data of this study were collected by using uninvolved conversation observation, recording (screenshoot), and writing techniques. The data analysis technique used was by including stages of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. In this study, there were 4 (four) forms of illocutionary acts found in the hate speech on @safarinaswifty’s tweet replies. The illocutionary acts found were directives, expressives, representatives and commissives. The directive illocutionary acts employed in the data were indirect orders by the speaker that implied satire. The expressive illocutionary acts employed had words that showed negative expressions. The representative illocutionary acts employed in the data that contained facts, affirmations, conclusions, and descriptions of either things or occasions. The commissive illocutionary acts were employed in the data that had the word ‘mau’ said by the speaker and those that contained of promises. Besides, there found two types of hate speech on @safarinaswifty’s tweet replies. The types of the hate speech were insult and blasphemy. The speakers uttered the words of insult or humiliation such as stupid, attention-seeker, full of bullshits, dumb, pig, and other curse words.
Penelitian ini menggunakan ujaran-ujaran kebencian dalam balasan tweet pada akun @safarinaswifty yang dianalisis menggunakan kajian pragmatik. Tujuan dari penelitian ini, mendeskripsikan bentuk tindak tutur ilokusi dan jenis-jenis ujaran kebencian pada balasan tweet @safarinaswifty. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Data dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dengan menggunakan teknik Simak Bebas Libat Cakap (SBLC), teknik rekam (screenshot), dan teknik catat. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan yaitu dengan tahapan mereduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan simpulan. Dalam penelitian ini ditemukan empat bentuk tindak tutur ilokusi pada ujaran kebencian dalam balasan tweet @safarinaswifty. Tindak tutur ilokusi yang ditemukan berupa tindak tutur direktif, ekspresif, representatif, dan komisif. Tindak tutur direktif terdapat pada data yang merupakan perintah yang disampaikan penutur secara tidak langsung dan mengarah menyindir. Tindak tutur ekspresif yang ditemukan memiliki kata-kata yang menunjukkan suatu ungkapan perasaan negatif. Tindak tutur representatif terdapat pada data yang menyatakan suatu pernyataan mengenai fakta, penegasan, kesimpulan, dan menyatakan deskripsi akan sesuatu benda atau peristiwa. Tindak tutur komisif ditemukan pada data yang memiliki kata mau yang disampaikan penutur dan berisi mengenai janji. Selain itu, ditemukan dua jenis ujaran kebencian yang terdapat dalam balasan tweet @safarinaswifty. Jenis ujaran kebencian tersebut berupa ujaran kebencian penghinaan dan penistaan. Penutur menyampaikan kata-kata menghina dan merendahkan seperti bodoh, cari perhatian, banyak omong kosong, goblok, babi dan kata kotor atau umpatan.
References
Mahsun. 2007. Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ainin, N., Rokhmansyah, A., & Purwanti. 2019. Tipe Tuturan Remaja Perempuan Yatim dalam Interaksi Sehari-Hari: Kajian Pragmatik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v2i1.14
Nadar, F. X. 2013. Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Rokhmansyah, A., Purwanti, & Ainin, N. (2019). Pelanggaran Maksim pada Tuturan Remaja Perempuan Yatim: Kajian Psikopragmatik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 2(1), 1-14. https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JP-BSI/article/view/887
Rustono. 1999. Pokok-pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: CV IKIP Semarang Press.
Sulianta, Feri. 2011. Twitter For Business. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Sulianta, Feri. 2015. Keajaiban Sosial Media. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Surat Edaran Kapolri. 2015. SE/6/X/2015 Tentang Penanganan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech). Jakarta.
Syukur, S. E. H., Soe’oed, R., & Mulawarman, W. G. 2020. Tindak Tutur Remaja sebagai Anak Tunggal dalam Interaksi Sehari-Hari di Kelas: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 3(4), 445-454. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i4.128
Yule, George. 2014. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
![]()
Every work in Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).