Maharani Saskia Puteri, M. Bahri Arifin, Famala Eka Sanhadi R.


Political leaders used political speech that contained intentional purposes to suggest various political agenda. Theresa May, United Kingdom’s prime minister from 2016 to 2019, used political speech entitled Britain, the great meritocracy to deliver British exit (Brexit). Therefore, to discover the purposes of May’s speech, this study aimed to identify the types of illocutionary acts employed in the speech based on Searle’s theory of the classification of illocutionary acts and the contexts underlying the illocutionary acts produced based on Hymes’ SPEAKING model of contexts. To conduct this study, descriptive-qualitative method and content analysis approach were used. Then, the data collection was done by close reading, speech listening, and note taking techniques. After that, compiling, disassembling, reassembling, interpreting and concluding were taken as data analysis process. Finally, the results of the study showed that 4 (four) illocutionary act types namely assertives, directives, commissives, and expressives were employed in the speech. By these findings, assertive type was the most frequently used one as this type enabled the speaker to characterize her belief to be in true or false dimensions. Functionally, it transmitted the prominent purpose of the speech which was to show both preferences and disfavors of May upon Britain. Otherwise, declaration type was not found to fit in the specific context presented at that time that was to depict how Britain should be within May’s term. Additionally, contexts underlying the emergence of the illocutionary acts in the speech were setting and scene, participants, ends, act sequence, key, instrumentalities, norms, and genre.


illocutionary acts; Britain; the great meritocracy speech; Theresa May

Full Text:



Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. London, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press

Bach, K. (2006). Pragmatics and semantics. In Horn, H. R & Ward, G. (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (1st ed., pp. 463-487). Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

De Vos, A.S & Delport. (2005). Scientific theory and professional research. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York, United States of America: Longman

Hales, D. (2010). An introduction to triangulation. Ganeva, Switzerland: UNAIDS Organization

Heywood, A. (2013). Politics. London, United Kingdom: Red Globe Press

Horn, H. R & Ward, G. (Ed(s).). (2006). The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Huang, Y. (2014). Pragmatics (2nd ed.). New York, United States: Oxford University Press

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge, United States of America: Cambridge University Press

Searle, J & Vanderveken D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Wardaugh, R. (2006). An introductions to sociolinguistics. Victoria, Australia: Blackwell Publishing

William, C. (2007). Research Methods. Journal of Business and Economic Research, 5(3), 65-72

Yin, R.K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, United States of America: The Guilford Press

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Maharani Saskia Puteri, M. Bahri Arifin, Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu

Redaksi Jurnal Ilmu Budaya

Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Mulawarman
Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara, Gunung Kelua, Kec. Samarinda Ulu, Kota Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia 75123


Each works in Ilmu Budaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.