From Equivalence to Function: Pragmatic Approaches to Faithful Translation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v9i3.21586Abstract
The concept of fidelity in translation has long been dominated by the pursuit of equivalence, whether formal, dynamic, or functional. However, recent developments in translation studies suggest that this paradigm may be insufficient to address the complexities of meaning, intention, and cultural context. This article argues for a reconceptualization of faithful translation through a pragmatic lens, emphasizing communicative purpose, contextual appropriateness, and cultural resonance over rigid equivalence. Drawing from theories such as Skopos Theory, Relevance Theory, and speech act pragmatics, the study explores how pragmatic considerations shape faithful translation as an interpretive and purpose-driven act. By analyzing examples from literary, legal, and intercultural translation scenarios, the article demonstrates how function-oriented approaches better accommodate nuanced intentions and audience expectations. This shift from equivalence to function does not imply a betrayal of the source text but rather a redefinition of fidelity as a dynamic negotiation of meaning across cultural and linguistic boundaries. The paper concludes by proposing a model of pragmatic fidelity that integrates context-sensitive strategies and ethical responsibility, offering a more adaptable and communicatively effective framework for modern translation practice.
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Catford, J. C. (1965). A linguistic theory of translation: An essay in applied linguistics. Oxford
Chesterman, A. (2001). Proposal for a Hieronymic oath. The Translator, 7(2), 139–154.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Gutt, E.-A. (1991). Translation and relevance: Cognition and context. Basil Blackwell.
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the translator. Longman.
House, J. (1977). A model for translation quality assessment. Gunter Narr Verlag.
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translating. E. J. Brill.
Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1969). The theory and practice of translation. E. J. Brill.
Nord, C. (1997). Translating as a purposeful activity: Functionalist approaches explained. St. Jerome Publishing.
Pym, A. (2010). Exploring translation theories. Routledge.
Schäffner, C. (2012). Skopos theory. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of translation studies (Vol. 1, pp. 235–238). John Benjamins.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Simon, S. (1996). Gender in translation: Cultural identity and the politics of transmission. Routledge.
Soemarsono, M. (2002). Bahasa hukum dan peristilahan hukum dalam perundang-undangan. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive translation studies and beyond. John Benjamins.
Venuti, L. (1995). The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation. Routledge.
Vermeer, H. J. (1989). Skopos and commission in translational action. In A. Chesterman (Ed.), Readings in translation theory (pp. 173–187). Finn Lectura.
Vermeer, H. J. (1989). Skopos and commission in translational action. In A. Chesterman (Ed.), Readings in translation theory (pp. 173–187). Finn Lectura.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![]()
Every work in Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).