MANAGEMENT OF SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS WITH INTRABDOMINAL TRAUMATICS IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

Indra Sukmana Putra, Ari Santri Palinrungi

Abstract


Management of patients with septic shock with intrabdominal trauma is a complex medical treatment in the intensive care unit because the patient must be closely monitored and given adequate therapy. This case report is a case from the intensive care unit at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar. The patient was treated for 30 days starting on 10/24/23. The patient is a 15 year old male with the main complaint of a stab wound from a wooden beam that was stuck in his buttocks after falling from an 8 meter high building. The patient suffered stab wounds from the rectal, intrabdominal, diaphragm, left hemithorax to the pericard. The patient was referred from Pelamonia Hospital, Makassar, which had undergone airway treatment, then referred to Wahidin Hospital, Makassar. This patient underwent resuscitation and surgery, then was transferred to the intensive care unit. During the operation, serous laceration of the transverse colon, rectal laceration, urethral rupture, diaphragm and pericardial laceration were found. Patients had an APACHE II score of 17, SOFA score of 6 predicted mortality of 33.3%. Management during in the intensive care unit is treating the source of infection, fluid resuscitation, administering vasopressors. Norepinephrine as a first-line vasopressor agent with an initial target mean arterial pressure (MAP) is > 65mm Hg. Vasopressin is the second choice for treating septic shock, targeting MAP ≥ 65mmHg. Complicated intrabdominal infections are often caused by polymicrobial infections and require a combination of parenteral antibiotics during treatment. Therefore, it is necessary to select an antimicrobial agent appropriate to the patient's individual dosage. In cases of suspected intrabdominal infection, an aminoglycoside in combination with a beta lactam is recommended once daily, as gram-negative multidrug resistance often occurs. The empirical antibiotic given was a combination of meropenem 1gr/8 hours/IV + Amikacin 1gr/24 hours/IV for 6 days, continuous renal replacement therapy on treatment days 2 to 3 for 24 hours with CVVDHF modality. The results of the procalcitonin examination showed a downward trend followed by improvement in hemodynamics, decreased need for vasopressors, improved consciousness, gradual removal of the ventilator and transition to usual care on day 20. Comprehensive sepsis management resulted in better patient outcomes.

Key words: Septic shock, Intrabdominal infection, Resuscitation, Continuous renal replacement therapy.


Keywords


Anestesi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Pangalila FJ V, Mansjoer A. Penatalaksanaan sepsis dan syok sepsis optimalisasi FASTHUGBID editor: pehimpunan dokter intensive care indonesiam (PERDICI ) [Internet]. 2017. Available from: www.perdici.org

Karkar A, Ronco C. Prescription of CRRT: a pathway to optimize therapy. Ann Intensive Care [Internet]. 2020;10(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-0648-y

Constantinescu C, Pasca S, Tat T, Teodorescu P, Vlad C, Iluta S, et al. Continuous renal replacement therapy in cytokine release syndrome following immunotherapy or cellular therapies? J Immunother cancer. 2020;8(1):1–8.

Boenisch S, Fae P, Drexel H, Walli AK, Fraunberger P. Are circulating levels of CRP compared to IL-6 and PCT still relevant in intensive care unit patients? 1) . Labm. 2013;37(1).

Liu F, Li L, Xu M Da, Wu J, Luo D, Zhu YS, et al. Prognostic value of interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in patients with COVID-19. J Clin Virol [Internet]. 2020;127(April):104370. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104370

Honore PM, Hoste E, Molnár Z, Jacobs R, Joannes-Boyau O, Malbrain MLNG, et al. Cytokine removal in human septic shock: Where are we and where are we going? Ann Intensive Care [Internet]. 2019;9(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0530-y

Chawla R, Todi S. ICU Protocols. Vol. I, ICU Protocols: A Step-wise Approach, Vol I. 2019. 1–632 p.

Jean-Louis Vincent, Rui Moreno. Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill. Crit Care [Internet]. 2010;14:207–16. Available from: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/cc8204

Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Kluger Y, Agastra E, Abu-Zidan FM, Abbas AES, et al. WSES/GAIS/SIS-E/WSIS/AAST global clinical pathways for patients with intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16(1):1–48.

Shahrami1 B, Najmeddin1 F, Amini1 S, Rouini2 MR, Khezrnia4 SS, Najafi3 A, et al. Evaluation of Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients with Intra-abdominal Sepsis. Adv Pharm Bull. 2020;10(1):114–8.

Zhang MK, Rao ZG, Ma T, Tang M, Xu TQ, He XX, et al. Appropriate empirical antifungal therapy is associated with a reduced mortality rate in intensive care unit patients with invasive fungal infection: A real-world retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database. Front Med. 2022;9(September):1–11.

Guarino M, Perna B, Cesaro AE, Maritati M, Spampinato MD, Contini C, et al. 2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department. J Clin Med. 2023;12(9).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jkm.v11i1.16602

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Kedokteran Mulawarman

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kedokteran Mulawarman by Faculty of Medicine Mulawarman University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.