A conversation analysis of turn-taking strategies in the 2024 U.S. presidential debate

Muhammad Rizqullah Zuhayr, Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu

Abstract


This study investigates turn-taking strategies employed by Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the 2024 U.S. presidential debate. Using Conversation Analysis (CA) as the methodological framework, the research examines how interruptions, overlaps, pauses, and topic shifts are managed to negotiate control, assert dominance, or maintain authority in a high-stakes political context. Data were drawn from the official debate recording and analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that both verbal and nonverbal cues function as strategic tools in shaping debate dynamics and influencing audience perceptions of leadership and credibility. By situating turn-taking within the field of political communication, this study contributes to understanding the structural mechanisms underlying political discourse and shows how conversational strategies reflect power relations and persuasion beyond rhetoric and content.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aryanti, M. L., Yuliawati, S., Ekawati, D., & Darmayanti, N. (2024). The use of turn taking in the 2020 US presidential debate: A conversation analysis study. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 7(3), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v7i4.981

Auer, P. (2021). Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the “current-speaker-selects-next” rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 23(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620966922

Benoit, W. L. (2007). Determinants of Defense in Presidential Debates. Communication Research Reports, 24(4), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090701624221

Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002a). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge University Press.

Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002b). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge University Press.

Craig, Geoffrey. (2016). Performing politics: media interviews, debates and press conferences. Polity Press.

Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834

Heritage, J. (2018). Turn-taking in political discourse: An overview. In R. ; F. B. Wodak (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and politics (pp. 219–233). Routledge.

Heritage, John, & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. In Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135

Hutchby, Ian., & Wooffitt, Robin. (2008). Conversation analysis. Polity.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Liddicoat, Anthony. (2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. Continuum.

Rohmah, Z., & Suwandi, A. F. (2022). Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s Interruptions In Presidential Debates. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 8(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i1.2359

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974a). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/412243

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974b). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/412243

SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (2000a). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019

SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (2000b). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019

Schubert, C. (2019). ‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates. Discourse Studies, 21(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619842734

Tymbay, A. (2022). Effectiveness of interruptions as a communicative strategy in the 2020 Presidential Debates in the USA. Brno Studies in English, (2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2022-2-5

Yanti Kristina Sinaga, Marnala Pangaribuan, & Nanda Saputra. (2021). Turn-Taking Strategies Analysis in Conversation between President Jokowi and Boy William in Nebeng Boy Youtube Channel. LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature, 2(3), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.33258/linglit.v2i3.509




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v9i3.23021

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Rizqullah Zuhayr, Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu

Editorial address:

Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Mulawarman
Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara, Gunung Kelua, Kec. Samarinda Ulu, Kota Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia 75123
Email: jurnalilmubudaya.fibunmul@gmail.com
Website: http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JBSSB 

 

Creative Commons License

Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License