A conversation analysis of turn-taking strategies in the 2024 U.S. presidential debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v9i3.23021Abstract
This study investigates turn-taking strategies employed by Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the 2024 U.S. presidential debate. Using Conversation Analysis (CA) as the methodological framework, the research examines how interruptions, overlaps, pauses, and topic shifts are managed to negotiate control, assert dominance, or maintain authority in a high-stakes political context. Data were drawn from the official debate recording and analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that both verbal and nonverbal cues function as strategic tools in shaping debate dynamics and influencing audience perceptions of leadership and credibility. By situating turn-taking within the field of political communication, this study contributes to understanding the structural mechanisms underlying political discourse and shows how conversational strategies reflect power relations and persuasion beyond rhetoric and content.
References
Aryanti, M. L., Yuliawati, S., Ekawati, D., & Darmayanti, N. (2024). The use of turn taking in the 2020 US presidential debate: A conversation analysis study. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 7(3), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v7i4.981
Auer, P. (2021). Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the “current-speaker-selects-next” rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 23(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620966922
Benoit, W. L. (2007). Determinants of Defense in Presidential Debates. Communication Research Reports, 24(4), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090701624221
Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002a). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge University Press.
Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002b). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge University Press.
Craig, Geoffrey. (2016). Performing politics: media interviews, debates and press conferences. Polity Press.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834
Heritage, J. (2018). Turn-taking in political discourse: An overview. In R. ; F. B. Wodak (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and politics (pp. 219–233). Routledge.
Heritage, John, & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. In Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135
Hutchby, Ian., & Wooffitt, Robin. (2008). Conversation analysis. Polity.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Liddicoat, Anthony. (2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. Continuum.
Rohmah, Z., & Suwandi, A. F. (2022). Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s Interruptions In Presidential Debates. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 8(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i1.2359
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974a). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/412243
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974b). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/412243
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (2000a). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (2000b). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019
Schubert, C. (2019). ‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates. Discourse Studies, 21(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619842734
Tymbay, A. (2022). Effectiveness of interruptions as a communicative strategy in the 2020 Presidential Debates in the USA. Brno Studies in English, (2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2022-2-5
Yanti Kristina Sinaga, Marnala Pangaribuan, & Nanda Saputra. (2021). Turn-Taking Strategies Analysis in Conversation between President Jokowi and Boy William in Nebeng Boy Youtube Channel. LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature, 2(3), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.33258/linglit.v2i3.509
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Every work in Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
