The Representation of Orientalism in The Hate U Give Movie

Ridho Adam Pratama, Alamsyah Tawakkal

Abstract


This research aims to explain how Orientalism is represented in The Hate U Give movie through the main character of Starr Carter using the Orientalism theory by Edward Said. In this research, the researcher uses qualitative research and descriptive method. Furthermore, the researcher elaborates on the Postcolonial issue in the literary work using the Postcolonial approach. The data of this research is taken from The Hate U Give (2018) movie directed by George Tillman Jr. and its English subtitle that is downloaded from the website subscene.com. The researcher finds there are seven data representing five representations of Orientalism in The Hate U Give movie through Starr Carter. The first representation is “black” portrayed Starr’s action rules and appearance. The second representation is “violent” described through Starr’s choice of words. The third representation is “inappropriate” depicted through Starr’s relationship with her white boyfriend. The fourth representation is “powerless” illustrated through the difference of power and authority between Starr and a white cop. The fifth representation is “poor” displayed through the sad moment of Starr. The conclusion of this research is the five representations of Orientalism represented by Starr Carter in The Hate U Give (2018) movie are black, violent, inappropriate, powerless, and poor portrayed by Starr Carter in the negative and bad images.

Keywords


Character; Characterization; Movie; Orientalism; Representation

Full Text:

PDF

References


“Best Sellers – Books – Dec 31, 2017.” The New York Times, 31 Dec. 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/2017/12/31/. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.

“Black”. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2023, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/black. Accessed 28 May 2023.

“Childlike”. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2023, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/childlike. Accessed 28 May 2023.

“Different”. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2023, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/different. Accessed 28 May 2023.

“George Tillman Jr. – Biography – Movies & TV – NYTimes.com.” The New York Times, 26 Feb. 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/2011022604951/https://movies.nytimes.com/person/231879/George-Tillman-Jr-/biography. Accessed 11 Dec. 2022.

“Hood”. Merriam-Webster, Merriam-Webster, Incorporated, 2023, https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/hood. Accessed 28 May 2023.

“Inappropriate”. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2023, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/inappropriate. Accessed 28 May 2023.

“Inferior”. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2023, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/inferior. Accessed 28 May 2023.

“Irrational”. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2023, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/irrational. Accessed 28 May 2023.

“Poor”. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2023, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/poor. Accessed 28 May 2023.

“Powerless”. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2023, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/powerless. Accessed 28 May 2023.

“Violent”. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2023, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/violent. Accessed 28 May 2023.

Abrams, M.H. A Glossary of Literary Terms. United States of America. Earl McPeek. 1999.

Ashcrofth, B., Griffiths, G., Tiffin, H. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial. London: Routledge. 2003.

Barnard, Alan, and Jonathan Spencer. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. 2nd ed. Routledge: New York. 2010.

Benneth, Andrew, and Nicholas Royle. Introduction to Literature, Criticism, and Theory. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Pearson. 2014.

Dobie, Ann. B. Theory into Practice: An Introduction to Literary Criticism. 3rd ed. Boston: Wadsworth. 2011.

Goddard, Wayne, and Stuart Melville. Research Methodology: An Introduction. South Africa: Luta & co.ltd. 2004.

Klarer, Mario. An Introduction to Literary Studies. London: Routledge, 2004.

Loomba, Ania. Colonialism/Postcolonialism. 2nd ed. Great Britain: Routledge. 2005.

Miles, Hubberman. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. New York: Sage Publication, Inc. 1994.

Petrie, Dennis, and Joseph Boggs. The Art of Watching Film. 8th ed. New York: 2012.

Rabiger, Michael. Directing: Directing Film Techniques and Aesthetics. New York: Focal Press. 2008.

Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books. 1978.

Tyson, Louis. Critical Theory Today. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. 2006.

Vanderstoep and Johnson. Research Method for Everyday Life. Josser-Bass, 2009.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v7i3.12343

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ridho Adam Pratama, Alamsyah Tawakkal

Editorial address:

Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Mulawarman
Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara, Gunung Kelua, Kec. Samarinda Ulu, Kota Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia 75123
Email: jurnalilmubudaya.fibunmul@gmail.com
Website: http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JBSSB 

 

Creative Commons License

Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License