“You must try it”: A forensic linguistics analysis of online gambling promotions in social media comment sections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v11i0.22636Keywords:
deceptive communication, forensic linguistics, online gambling, persuasive discourse, social media commentsAbstract
This study investigates the persuasive strategies employed in online gambling advertisements circulated through social media comment sections. Drawing on a dataset of 32 interactions from TikTok between 21 August and 23 September 2025, the analysis examines how language constructs trust, credibility, and manipulation. Each dataset entry includes a primary promotional comment, often framed as a testimonial of success, and at least one reply, ensuring dialogic interaction. Using a move analysis approach, the findings reveal systematic patterns of persuasion, including claims of winning, reinforcement from other users, and staged dialogue that collectively simulate authenticity. These patterned linguistic moves demonstrate that the comments are strategically orchestrated rather than spontaneous. The recurrence of testimonial chaining, where initial claims are echoed and validated by follow up comments, emerges as a key marker of deception. Engagement metrics such as likes and replies further amplify visibility, making these illicit promotions harder to detect or remove. This study highlights how forensic linguistic analysis can uncover the structural and interactive dimensions of deceptive discourse, offering insights into the mechanisms of online gambling promotion in Indonesia’s digital landscapeReferences
Al-Rawi, A., Kane, O., & Bizimana, A. J. (2021). Topic modelling of public Twitter discourses, part bot, part active human user, on climate change and global warming. Journal of Environmental Media, 2(1), 31-53.
Ajayi, T. M. (2022). Discursive-manipulative strategies in scam emails and SMS: The Nigerian perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 18(1), 175-195.
Armitage, R. (2021). Gambling among adolescents: An emerging public health problem. The Lancet Public Health, 6(3), e143.
Ahmad, A. A., Khairunnisa, D., Anwar, D. K., Nurzamiyanti, G., Pebriyanti, J. S., & Supriyadi, T. (2025). The influence of online gambling advertisements on student consumptive behavior: An Islamic economic perspective. Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 6(2), 187-203.
Beauvais, C. (2022). Fake news: Why do we believe it?. Joint bone spine, 89(4), 105371.
Biber, D., Upton, T. A., & Connor, U. (2007). Discourse on the Move.
Chen, Y., Chen, L., & Pan, Y. (2024). Social media influencer endorsement: The conditional effects of product attribute description in sponsored influencer videos. Journal of Marketing Management, 40(9-10), 675-703.
Chiluwa, I., Taiwo, R., & Ajiboye, E. (2020). Hate speech and political media discourse in Nigeria: The case of the Indigenous People of Biafra. International Journal of media & cultural politics, 16(2), 191-212.
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (Eds.). (2010). The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 473-486). London: Routledge.
Evans, N. J., & Wojdynski, B. (2020). An introduction to the special issue on native and covert advertising formats. International Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 1-3.
Ghevolor, A. J., Bassey, V. O., & Ekpang, J. N. (2023). Rhetorical strategies in selected Nigerian print media advertisements. English Linguistics Research, 12(2), 34-57.
Grant, T., & MacLeod, N. (2020). Language and online identities: The undercover policing of internet sexual crime. Cambridge University Press.
Grant, T., & Tayebi, T. (2023). Forensic linguistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 280-291). Routledge.
Ik-Iloanusi, A. I., & Chiemezie, O. A. (2023). Conversational analysis of scam calls in Nigeria. Awka Journal Of Linguistics And Languages, 2.
Jakupov, A., Longhi, J., & Zeddini, B. (2024). The Language of deception: Applying findings on opinion spam to legal and forensic discourses. Languages, 9(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9010010
Jimmy, M. F. R., & Sumarlan, I. (2024). Audience reception: Prevention of online gambling site advertisements within the scope of Instagram. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi), 8(3), 619-626.
Ju, I., Lee, H., & Sherrick, B. (2022). Consumer responses to covert marketing communications: A case of native advertising disclosure in news contexts. Journal of promotion management, 28(7), 1107-1128.
Juanda, M. R., Kurniawan, E., & Hermawan, B. (2025). Move analysis of fraud in a mediated online transaction. Discourse & Communication, 19(2), 237-256.
Olsson, J., & Luchjenbroers, J. (2013). Forensic linguistics. A&C Black.
Parker, C., Albarrán-Torres, C., Briggs, C., Burgess, J., Carah, N., Andrejevic, M., ... & Obeid, A. (2024). Addressing the accountability gap: Gambling advertising and social media platform responsibilities. Addiction Research & Theory, 32(4), 312-318.
Rossi, R., Nairn, A., Smith, J., & Inskip, C. (2021). “Get a£ 10 Free Bet Every Week!”—gambling advertising on Twitter: Volume, content, followers, engagement, and regulatory compliance. Journal of public policy & marketing, 40(4), 487-504.
Salminen, J., Mustak, M., Jung, S. G., Makkonen, H., & Jansen, B. J. (2025). Decoding deception in the online marketplace: Enhancing fake review detection with psycholinguistics and transformer models. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 1-18.
Sarfraz, A., Ahmad, A., Zeshan, F., Hamid, M., & Alshalali, T. A. N. (2025). Unmasking deception: Detection of fake profiles in online social ecosystems. Journal of Big Data, 12(1), 214.
Starbird, K. (2019). Disinformation's spread: bots, trolls and all of us. Nature, 571(7766), 449-450.
Stepaniuk, K., & Jarosz, K. (2021). Persuasive linguistic tricks in social media marketing communication—The memetic approach. PloS one, 16(7), e0253983.
Stoian, V. (2023). The eu approach to combating disinformation: between censorship and the “market for information”. In Routledge Handbook of Disinformation and National Security (pp. 311-327). Routledge.
Stsiampkouskaya, K., Joinson, A., & Piwek, L. (2023). To like or not to like? An experimental study on relational closeness, social grooming, reciprocity, and emotions in social media liking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 28(2), zmac036.
Suharsono, Y. (2019). Analisis pengaruh social media advertising, ewom, dan peer groups terhadap trust dan purchase intention (studi kasus pada konsumen Starbucks Pontianak). Equator Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship (EJME), 7(1).
Tenenboim, O. (2022). Comments, shares, or likes: What makes news posts engaging in different ways. Social Media+ Society, 8(4), 20563051221130282.
Tessier, S., Romo, L., & Zerhouni, O. (2021). Impact of advertising campaigns among online gamblers: The role perceptions of social support and personality traits. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 599988.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse studies, 8(1), 159-177.
Ye, N., Cheng, L., & Zhao, Y. (2019). Identity construction of suspects in telecom and internet fraud discourse: From a sociosemiotic perspective. Social Semiotics, 29(3), 319-335.
Zhang, Z. (2021). Infrastructuralization of TikTok: Transformation, power relationships, and platformization of video entertainment in China. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 219-236.
Zhang, Y., Gaggiano, J. D., Yongsatianchot, N., Suhaimi, N. M., Kim, M., Sun, Y., ... & Parker, A. G. (2023, April). What do we mean when we talk about trust in social media? A systematic review. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-22).
Zhang, N., Ruan, C., & Wang, X. (2025). You recommend, I trust: The interactive self-presentation strategies for social media influencers to build authenticity perception in short video scenes. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(3).translation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 37–42. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.030
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Every works in CaLLs is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
