Relasi kuasa dalam materi promosi pariwisata Dayak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v11i0.22567Keywords:
promosi pariwisata, Dayak, kolonialisme non-pribumi, representasi, wacana kritisAbstract
Promosi pariwisata seharusnya menjadi sarana untuk menampilkan budaya masyarakat adat secara adil dan menghormati keberadaan mereka sebagai subjek aktif. Namun, praktik promosi pariwisata di Kalimantan Timur masih merepresentasikan masyarakat Dayak sebagai figur tradisional yang terikat pada ritual dan pakaian adat, sementara keberadaan mereka dalam konteks modern sering diabaikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji secara kritis representasi budaya Dayak dalam promosi pariwisata Mahakam Ulu serta implikasinya terhadap relasi kuasa kolonial non-pribumi. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan analisis wacana kritis terhadap teks, gambar, dan video promosi pariwisata yang diproduksi lembaga non-Dayak, serta dilengkapi dengan wawancara semi-terstruktur bersama komunitas Dayak Bahau. Sebanyak 7 sampel dipilih secara purposif dari media daring dan arsip lembaga promosi berdasarkan relevansinya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa promosi pariwisata cenderung membingkai identitas Dayak dalam bentuk eksotisme dan historisasi, yang pada akhirnya memperkuat legitimasi pihak non-Dayak sebagai pemegang otoritas atas narasi kebudayaan. Di sisi lain, masyarakat Dayak mulai membangun representasi tandingan melalui konten yang menampilkan peran, mata pencaharian, dan identitas kontemporer mereka. Kesimpulannya, promosi pariwisata bukanlah ruang yang netral, melainkan arena kuasa yang dapat memperkuat marginalisasi atau sebaliknya membuka peluang perlawanan masyarakat adat.
References
Amoamo, M., & Thompson, A. (2010). (Re)Imaging Māori tourism: Representation and cultural hybridity in postcolonial New Zealand. Tourist Studies, 10(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797610379680
Battell Lowman, E., & Barker, A. (2016). Settler: Identity and colonialism in 21st century Canada. Fernwood Publishing.
Braun, B. (2002). The intemperate rainforest: Nature, culture, and power on Canada’s West Coast. University of Minnesota Press.
Butler, R., & Hinch, T. (2007). Tourism and Indigenous peoples: Issues and implications. Elsevier.
Carlson, E. (2016). Anti-colonial methodologies and practices for settler colonial studies. Settler Colonial Studies, 7(4), 496–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2016.1241213
Cooke, L. (2017). Carving “turns” and unsettling the ground under our feet (and skis): A reading of Sun Peaks resort as a settler colonial moral terrain. Tourist Studies, 17(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797616680851
Coulthard, G. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. UBC Press.
Foucault, M. (2019). Power: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984. Penguin UK.
Grimwood, B. S. R., Yudina, O., Muldoon, M., & Qiu, J. (2015). Responsibility in tourism: A discursive analysis. Annals of Tourism Research, 50, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.10.008
Hollinshead, K. (1998). Tourism, hybridity, and ambiguity: The relevance of Bhabha’s “Third Space” cultures. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(1), 121–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1998.11949822
Holmes, A., Grimwood, B. S. R., King, L., & Nation, L. K. D. F. (2016). Creating an indigenized visitor code of ethics: The development of Denesoline self-determination for sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(8–9), 1177–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1206110
Nasrullah. (2017). The Dayak: Close to the eyes, far from the heart. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Sciences Education—Multicultural Transformation in Education, Social Sciences and Wetland Environment (ICSSE 2017) (pp. 229–233). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icsse-17.2018.53
Pritchard, A., & Morgan, N. (2000). Privileging the male gaze: Gendered tourism landscapes. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(4), 884–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00113-9
Regan, P. (2010). Unsettling the settler within: Indian residential schools, truth telling, and reconciliation in Canada. UBC Press.
Salazar, N. B. (2013). The (im)mobility of tourism imaginaries. In M. Smith & G. Richards (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cultural tourism (pp. 34–39). Routledge.
Seiver, B., & Matthews, A. (2016). Beyond whiteness: A comparative analysis of representations of aboriginality in tourism destination images in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(8–9), 1298–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1182532
Setyoko, A., Setyowati, R., Sindy, D., Gunawan, A., Budaya, F. I., & Mulawarman, U. (2023). Dinamika sosial budaya dalam perkembangan kuliner nasi kuning di Samarinda. Seminar Nasional Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni “Membumikan Kesadaran Multikultural Masyarakat Melalui Ibu Kota Negara Nusantara (IKN)”, 23–36. https://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/CALLS/article/view/13137
Tsao, T. (2016). Indigenous agency and compliance: Contemporary literature about Dayaks. PMLA, 131(3), 686–700. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26158870
Veracini, L. (2015). The settler colonial present. Palgrave Macmillan.
Zahra Setiani, D. (2025). Analisis wacana kritis Teun A. Van Dijk dalam iklan Ramayana “Tulusnya Cinta”. CaLLs, 11, 15–24. https://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/CALLS/article/view/13314
YouTube. (2019, July 3). Settler colonialism explained [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUAOOlDQUd4&t=157s
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Every works in CaLLs is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
