Generation Z: Person Organization-Fit, Life Balance and Psychological Empowerment for Work Totality

Alvin Kurniawan, Abdul Rahman Shaleh

Abstract


Human functioning in a professional environment is becoming more efficient; however, this is not always commensurate with increased objectivity. Today, members of Generation Z express concerns about various work disruptions, including negative impacts on mental health caused by unhealthy work environments, which are often characterized by disrupted deadlines. This condition often leads to delays and ultimately has an impact on overall performance. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of person-organization-fit, work-life balance and psychological empowerment on the totality of work. This study uses a quantitative approach with multiple regression and adaptation of measuring instruments derived from previous studies, with the research subjects being Generation Z who work in the South Jakarta area. The sampling technique used was non-probability sampling, with a total of 208 respondents. The results of the study indicate that the totality of work is influenced by person-organization fit, work-life balance and psychological empowerment, with the greatest influence on work-life balance on the totality of work and the smallest influence on psychological empowerment on the totality of work of Generation Z, together person-organization fit, work-life balance and psychological empowerment affect the totality of work of Generation Z.

Fungsi manusia dalam lingkungan profesional menjadi semakin efisien; namun, hal ini tidak selalu sebanding dengan peningkatan objektivitas. Saat ini, anggota Generasi Z mengungkapkan kekhawatiran terkait berbagai gangguan pekerjaan, termasuk dampak negatif terhadap kesehatan mental yang disebabkan oleh lingkungan kerja yang tidak sehat, yang sering kali ditandai dengan tenggat waktu yang terganggu. Kondisi ini sering kali berujung pada penundaan dan akhirnya berdampak pada penurunan kinerja secara keseluruhan. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh person organization-fit, keseimbangan hidup dan pemberdayaan psikologis terhadap totalitas kerja. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan regresi berganda dan adaptasi alat ukur berasal dari penelitian sebelumnya, dengan subjek penelitian adalah generasi Z yang bekerja di kawasan Jakarta Selatan. Teknik sampling yang digunakan adalah non-probability sampling, dengan jumlah responden sebanyak 208 orang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa totalitas kerja di pengaruh oleh person-organization fit, keseimbangan kerja & hidup serta pemberdayaan psikologis, dengan pengaruh terbesar pada keseimbangan kerja & hidup terhadap totalitas kerja dan pengaruh terkecil pada pemberdayaan psikologi terhadap totalitas kerja generasi Z, secara bersama-sama person-organization fit, keseimbangan kerja & hidup pemberdayaan psikologis secara bersama-sama mempengaruhi totalitas kerja generasi Z.

Keywords


Person-Organization Fit; Work Life Balance; Psychological Empowerment and Work Engagement

Full Text:

FULL TEXT

References


Aliazas, J. V, Panoy, B. R., & Baguna, A. (2023). Person-Environment Fit: Empowering Leadership Practices on Teachers’ Work Engagement and Motivation. International Journal of Academe and Industry Research, 4(3).

Ashfaq, B., & Hamid, A. (2021). Person-organization fit and organization citizenship behavior: modeling the work engagement as a mediator. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 13(1), 19–39.

Asjari, S. N., & Gunawan, A. W. (2022). Pengaruh Work Life Balance, Internal Communication Dan Transformational Leadership Terhadap Employee Performance Dengan Employee Engagement Sebagai Variable Mediasi. Journal Transformation of Mandalika, 3(1), 168–190.

Aurel, R. O., Prakoso, H., & Putera, V. S. (2023). Pengaruh Psychological Empowerment terhadap Work Engagement pada Dosen. Bandung Conference Series: Psychology Science, 3(1), 316–325.

Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2017). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: a narrative synthesis”. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 31–53.

Bentley, L., & Halim, H. B. (2024). Evaluating the Long-Term Impact of Sustainable Tourism Practices on Local Communities and Natural Resources in Developing Countries. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 4(3), 136–141.

Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875.

Chin, W. W. (2009). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 655–690). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136.

Figueredo, J. M., García-Ael, C., Gragnano, A., & Topa, G. (2023). Cognitive and affective-motivational states as mediators of the association between presenteeism and job satisfaction. European Review of Applied Psychology, 73(6), 100865.

Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: a measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441.

Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 510–531.

Grobler, A. (2016). Person-organisational fit: A revised structural configuration. Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(5), 1419.

Hair, J F, Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100392.

Hair, Joseph F, Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

Hudson, A. (2005). The case for work/life balance: Closing the gap between policies and practice.

Johan, A. P., & Yusuf, A. (2022). Counterproductive work behavior, job stress, trait emotional intelligence and person organization fit among employees of leasing industry in Indonesia. Intangible Capital, 18(2), 233–246.

Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences OF INDIVIDUALS’FIT at work: A meta‐analysis OF person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.

Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.

Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454–470.

Lesener, T., Gusy, B., Jochmann, A., & Wolter, C. (2020). The drivers of work engagement: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal evidence. Work & Stress, 34(3), 259–278.

Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30.

Merdiaty, N. (2024). Person-job fit on work engagement with meaningful work as mediator. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(1), 134–145.

Rahman, M. F. W., Kistyanto, A., & Surjanti, J. (2022). Does cyberloafing and person‐organization fit affect employee performance? The mediating role of innovative work behavior. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(5), 44–64.

Riza, H., & Nugroho, A. S. (2020). Kaji terap kecerdasan buatan di Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi. Jurnal Sistem Cerdas, 3(1), 1–24.

Saraswati, K. D. (2019). Work engagement: The impact of psychological capital and organizational justice and its influence on turnover intention. J. Mgt. Mkt. Review, 4(1), 86–91.

Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). What is engagement? In Employee engagement in theory and practice. Routledge.

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

Schaufeli, W., Bakker, B., & A. (2004). Bevlogenheid: een begrip gemeten. Gedrag & Organisatie, 17(2).

Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981.

Shaleh, A. R. (2014). Totalitas Kerja Dan Perubahan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.

Shaleh, A. R. (2016). Analisis faktor skala totalitas kerja (work engagement. In Seminar ASEAN (pp. 12–17).

Shuck, B., & Herd, A. M. (2012). Employee engagement and leadership: exploring the convergence of two frameworks and implications for leadership development in HRD”. Human Resource Development Review, 11(2), 156–181.

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.

Syrek, C. J., Apostel, E., & Antoni, C. H. (2013). Stress in highly demanding IT jobs: Transformational leadership moderates the impact of time pressure on exhaustion and work–life balance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 252.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v12i4.17605

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Alvin Kurniawan, Abdul Rahman Shaleh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Indexing by :

         

 

________________________________________

PSIKOBORNEO: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Published by Faculty of Social and Political Siences, University of Mulawarman, Samarinda, East Kalimantan and This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 ________________________________________

PSIKOBORNEO: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi

Department of Psychology
Faculty of Social and Political Siences, University of Mulawarman
Jl. Muara Muntai Kampus Gn. Kelua Samarinda 75411
Phone: +62 813 35350368
E-Mail: psikoborneo@gmail.com / psikoborneo@fisip.unmul.ac.id