‘When Teachers Become Students’: Enhancing the Engagement of Public Senior High School XY Kediri Teachers During Online Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v10i3.6217

Keywords:

teacher, engagement, self-efficacy

Abstract

Online learning during the pandemic has reduced teacher engagement at SMAN XY Kediri. The 'When Teachers Become Students' training was to foster teacher engagement. This training used a Sense of Self-efficacy approach (instructional strategies, classroom management, & student engagement). This study used a quantitative approach with the experimental method of pretest-posttest design. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling with a total of 16 participants. Measurements were given before and after the training consisting of the engaged teacher scale by Klassen, Yerdelen, and Durksen (2013). Data were analyzed using paired sample t-test. There was an increase in the score of sense of self-efficacy (sig 0.00 (p<0.05)). It indicates that this training is quite effective in increasing teacher engagement at SMA XY Kediri. 

References

Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). “It gives you that sense of hope”: An exploration of technology use to mediate student engagement with mathematics. Heliyon, 6(1), e02945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02945

Borup, J., Chambers, C., & Srimson, R. (2019). Online teacher and on-site facilitator perceptions of parental engagement at a supplemental virtual high school. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4237

Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Drysdale, J. S. (2014). The nature of teacher engagement at an online high school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12089

Cents-Boonstra, M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Denessen, E., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. (2020). Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: an observation study of teacher and student behaviours. Research Papers in Education, 00(00), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184

Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers” sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1992.9943869

Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., & Martin, A. J. (2019). Teachers’ motivational approach: Links with students’ basic psychological need frustration, maladaptive engagement, and academic outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.002

Granziera, H., & Perera, H. N. (2019). Relations among teachers ’ self-e ffi cacy beliefs , engagement , and work satisfaction : A social cognitive view. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58(February), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.003

Grigg, S., Perera, H. N., McIlveen, P., & Svetleff, Z. (2018). Relations among math self efficacy, interest, intentions, and achievement: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.007

Høigaard, R., Giske, R., & Sundsli, K. (2012). Newly qualified teachers’ work engagement and teacher efficacy influences on job satisfaction, burnout, and the intention to quit. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.633993

Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2011). Statistics in Psychology Fifth edition Introduction to (5th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Klassen, R. M., Yerdelen, S., & Durksen, T. L. (2013a). Measuring Teacher Engagement: Development of the Engaged Teachers Scale (ETS). Frontline Learning Research, 1(2), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v1i2.44

Klassen, R. M., Yerdelen, S., & Durksen, T. L. (2013b). Measuring Teacher Engagement: Development of the Engaged Teachers Scale (ETS). Frontline Learning Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v1i2.44

Kurt, H., Güngör, F., & Ekici, G. (2014). The Relationship among Teacher Efficacy, Efficacy Regarding Teaching, and Responsibility for Student Achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 802–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.301

Lawson, K. (2015). The Trainer’s Handbook. In John Wiley & Sons (3rd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.02.006

Lubis, H., Ramadhani, A., & Rasyid, M. (2021). Stres Akademik Mahasiswa dalam Melaksanakan Kuliah Daring Selama Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Psikostudia : Jurnal Psikologi, 10(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v10i1.5454

Palmer, D. (2006). Durability of changes in self-efficacy of preservice primary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 655–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500404599

Perera, H. N., Vosicka, L., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Towards an integrative perspective on the structure of teacher work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108(2017), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.006

Rasyid, M., Rahmah, D. D. N., & Permatasari, R. F. (2021). Teacher’s Academic Optimism dalam Menghadapi Proses Belajar Mengajar Daring Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Psikostudia : Jurnal Psikologi, 10(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v10i1.5479

Roorda, D. L., Jorgensen, T. D., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2019). Different teachers, different relationships? Student-teacher relationships and engagement in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 75(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101761

Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). “Yes, I Can, I Feel Good, and I Just Do It!” On Gain Cycles and Spirals of Efficacy Beliefs, Affect, and Engagement. Applied Psychology, 60(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00435.x

Shaukat, S., & Iqbal, H. M. (2012). Teacher Self-Efficacy as a Function of Student Engagement, Instructional Strategies and Classroom Management. Pakistan Journal of Science and Clinical Psychology, 9(3), 82–85.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of Teacher Self-Efficacy and Relations With Strain Factors, Perceived Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Teacher Burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0

Smidt, A., Balandin, S., Sigafoos, J., & Reed, V. A. (2009). The Kirkpatrick model: A useful tool for evaluating training outcomes. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34(3), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250903093125

Sokmen, Y., & Kilic, D. (2019). The relationship between primary school teachers’ self-efficacy, autonomy, job satisfaction, teacher engagement and burnout: A model development study. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 709–721.

Song, J. H., Kim, J., & Bae, S. H. (2018). Job Performance in the Learning Organization: The Mediating Impacts of Self-Effi cacy and Work Engagement. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 30(4), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202

Xhemajli, A. (2016). The role of the teacher in interactive teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 4(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1601031X

Downloads

Published

2021-10-28