Psychometric Quality Evaluation of the U-GRT Figural Subtest Using the Rasch Model among Job Selection Participants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/x1bsp118Keywords:
Rasch Model, Figural Reasoning, Psychometrics, Personnel SelectionAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric quality of the Figural subtest of the USU General Reasoning Test (U-GRT) using the Rasch Model to determine its suitability for employee selection. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed using secondary data obtained from 728 job applicants who completed a Computer-Based Test (CBT). Data were analyzed using the Rasch Model to examine item difficulty, item fit statistics (infit and outfit mean square), unidimensionality through Principal Component Analysis of Residuals (PCAR), person reliability, and score categorization based on person ability estimates transformed from logit measures into T-scores. The findings indicated that item difficulty ranged from −1.645 to 4.001 logits, with most items clustered at moderate difficulty levels. Nineteen of the twenty items met the Rasch fit criteria, while one item displayed an outfit statistic exceeding the recommended threshold and therefore requires further revision. The PCAR results supported the assumption of unidimensionality, whereas person reliability was classified as acceptable. Ability estimates were subsequently converted into five interpretive categories: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. Overall, the Figural subtest of the U-GRT demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, although additional items representing extreme difficulty levels are recommended to improve measurement precision across the full range of ability.
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi kualitas psikometrik subtes Figural pada USU General Reasoning Test (U-GRT) menggunakan Model Rasch sebagai dasar penilaian kelayakan instrumen dalam seleksi kerja. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan data sekunder yang berasal dari 728 peserta seleksi kerja berbasis Computer-Based Test (CBT). Analisis dilakukan melalui Model Rasch untuk mengevaluasi tingkat kesukaran aitem, kesesuaian aitem terhadap model (infit dan outfit mean square), unidimensionalitas menggunakan Principal Component Analysis of Residuals (PCAR), reliabilitas person, serta penyusunan kategorisasi skor berdasarkan estimasi kemampuan dalam satuan logit yang ditransformasikan menjadi T-score. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kesukaran aitem berada pada rentang −1,645 hingga 4,001 logit dengan sebagian besar aitem berada pada kategori kesukaran sedang. Sebanyak 19 dari 20 aitem memenuhi kriteria kesesuaian model Rasch, sedangkan satu aitem menunjukkan nilai outfit di atas batas yang direkomendasikan sehingga memerlukan evaluasi lebih lanjut. Analisis PCAR mendukung asumsi unidimensionalitas, sementara nilai person reliability berada pada kategori cukup. Kategorisasi skor menghasilkan lima tingkat kemampuan, yaitu sangat rendah, rendah, sedang, tinggi, dan sangat tinggi. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa subtes Figural U-GRT memiliki kualitas psikometrik yang memadai, meskipun pengembangan aitem pada tingkat kesukaran ekstrem masih diperlukan untuk meningkatkan presisi pengukuran.
References
Akhtar, H. (2025). Measuring Process Factors of Fluid Reasoning Using Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing. Assessment, 32(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241236351
Bailey, R. (2017). HR applications of psychometrics. Psychometric Testing: Critical Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119183020.ch7
Blum, D., Holling, H., Galibert, M. S., & Forthmann, B. (2016). Task difficulty prediction of figural analogies. Intelligence. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300927
Breuer, S. (2023). Find the Mistake Psychometric Properties of an Innovative Response Format for Figural Matrices Tasks. Journal of Individual Differences, 44(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000386
Castillo, C. C., & Roca, G. J. M. (2021). Effectiveness of psychometric tests for the selection of personnel in jobs in the retail sector. pdfs.semanticscholar.org. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6de8/d6477bbf84f13c401e27e20329fd2400f20a.pdf
Denovan, A., Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., & Escolà-Gascón, Á. (2024). The Inventory of Personality Organization-Reality Testing Subscale and Belief in Science Scale: Confirmatory factor and Rasch analysis of thinking style measures. In Plos one. journals.plos.org. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0310055
Dijksma, I., Stuiver, M., & Lucas, C. (2023). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Grit scale in Marine recruits using Rasch analysis. BMJ Mil Health. https://militaryhealth.bmj.com/content/169/5/425.abstract
Ellingwood, H., Williams, K. M., Sitarenios, G., & ... (2020). Psychometric properties of a contextualized, actuarially informed assessment for law enforcement personnel selection: the M-PULSE Inventory. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9290-0
Gul, S., & Ghazal, S. (2022). Need of psychometrics for recruitment and selection in organizations: A qualitative perspective from a developing country. Journal of Professional & Applied Psychology. https://iprpk.com/ojs/index.php/jpap/article/view/96
Hamzah, H., Govindasamy, P., & Sudhir, J. J. (2024). Psychometric evaluation of the Cognitive Ability Assessment using Rasch analysis and exploratory factor analysis. In Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development. publisher.unimas.my. https://publisher.unimas.my/ojs/index.php/JCSHD/article/view/10611
Hapsan, A., Mulyatiningsih, E., Hidayati, K., & ... (2026). Assessing Candidates for the Indonesian Civil Service: An Analysis of Item Characteristics in the Academic Potential Test Using the Item Response Theory Approach. In Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. cyberleninka.ru. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/assessing-candidates-for-the-indonesian-civil-service-an-analysis-of-item-characteristics-in-the-academic-potenial-test-using-the
Hobson, E. G. (2015). Using the Rasch model in a computer adaptive testing application to enhance the measurement quality of emotional intelligence. search.proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/45d88f9e4b964634fb6b19ec99fdf4aa/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y
Holzman, M. A. (2018). Evaluating rater effects in the context of ethical reasoning essay assessment: An application of the many-facets rasch measurement model. search.proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/7febfc134396f46f7e150bb0276dfad0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Kenku, A. A., Yahaya, I., & Uzoigwe, T. L. (2026). Theoretical Perspectives on Psychometric Assessment as a Strategic Mechanism in Personnel Selection and Recruitment. NIU Journal of Social Sciences. https://www.niujournals.ac.ug/ojs/index.php/niujoss/article/view/2446
Landers, R. N., Auer, E. M., Dunk, L., Langer, M., & Tran, K. N. (2023). A simulation of the impacts of machine learning to combine psychometric employee selection system predictors on performance prediction, adverse impact, and number of dropped predictors. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12587
Lee, S. C., Lee, Y. C., & Chiu, E. C. (2023). Psychometric validation of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument using Rasch analysis in people with dementia. In Medicine. journals.lww.com. https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2023/08110/psychometric_validation_of_the_cognitive_abilities.2.aspx
Lee, S. Y., & Hong, A. J. (2021). Psychometric investigation of the cultural intelligence scale using the Rasch measurement model in South Korea. In Sustainability. mdpi.com. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3139
Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2017). The effects of predictor method factors on selection outcomes: A modular approach to personnel selection procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-43607-001
Lievens, F., Sackett, P. R., & Zhang, C. (2021). Personnel selection: A longstanding story of impact at the individual, firm, and societal level. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1849386
Lloyd, E. D. (2026). A Comparison of Classical and Rasch Models for Analyzing Job Analysis Data. search.proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/52760e9636f5a67cdfeaffd547a36dd8/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Magro, B., & Vella, M. C. (2020). Understanding the Use of Psychometric Testing by Maltese Organisations for the Purpose of Recruitment and Selection. MCAST Journal of Applied Research & Practice. https://journal.mcast.edu.mt/seo/article/145691/en
Manikeswari, G. D., & Kumar, R. S. P. (2024). Psychometric testing-the game changer: a 360-degree view of psychometric testing and its applicability in HR functions. International Journal of Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2024.139112
Marastuti, A., Anggoro, W. J., Marvianto, R. D., Afghani, A., & Azzam, A. (2020). Perbandingan properti psikometri antara tes PAPs berbentuk computer-based dan paper and pencil test. In Jurnal Psikologi UGM. academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/download/71090313/pdf.pdf
Mönke, F. W., Roulin, N., & Lievens, F. (2024). Validity of social media assessments in personnel selection: A systematic review of the initial evidence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-48832-001
Motta, C. da, Castilho, P., Pato, M. T., & Carvalho, C. B. (2022). Rasch model analysis of the Situational Test of Emotional Understanding–brief in a large Portuguese sample. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00862-6
Mühling, A., Ruf, A., & Hubwieser, P. (2015). Design and first results of a psychometric test for measuring basic programming abilities. Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818320
Noperi, H., Diani, R., & Irwandani, I. (2025). Psychometric analysis of the critical thinking skills instrument in physics learning using the Rasch model. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/IJSME/article/view/28770
Preti, A., Vellante, M., & Petretto, D. R. (2017). The psychometric properties of the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: An item response theory (IRT) analysis. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2017.1300091
Preuß, J. (2025). Using Cognitive Diagnostic Models to Evaluate the Two-Process Theory of Matrix Reasoning. Journal of Intelligence, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13020022
Rohmah, Y. S., & Widhiarso, W. (2019). Pengujian validitas konstruk gadjah mada scholastic test (GMST) melalui analisis faktor eksploratori. In Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Gajah Mada, December. researchgate.net. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wahyu-Widhiarso/publication/337902024_Pengujian_Validitas_Konstruk_Gadjah_Mada_Scholastic_Test_GMST_Melalui_Analisis_Faktor_Eksploratori/links/5df160c592851c836475e5ed/Pengujian-Validitas-Konstruk-Gadjah-Mada-Scholastic-Test-GMST-Melalui-Analisis-Faktor-Eksploratori.pdf
Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., & ... (2022). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2022-17327-001.html
Sinaga, Y. C. (2024). Evaluasi Psikometri Aitem Induktif Figural pada USU General Reasoning Test (UGRT). repositori.usu.ac.id. https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/97537
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2017). Modern psychometric theory to support personnel assessment and selection. In Handbook of Employee Selection. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315690193-42
Stenulson, D. (2025). Rasch Model Utilization Towards Developing an Instrument for Measuring Creative Drive. search.proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/03ec18ca4ea4ec5384632121666155b0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Suciati, I., Walanda, D. K., Idris, M., Napitupulu, M., Anggraini, A., Lefrida, R., & Walanda, R. A. (2026). Psychometric Evaluation of Culturally Responsive Numeracy and Problem-Solving Assessment: A Rasch Modeling Approach. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. https://jpmipa.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jpmipa/article/view/1160
Sugiyono, & Lestari, P. (2021). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Cara Mudah Menulis Artikel pada Jurnal Internasional) (Sunarto (ed.); I). CV. Alfabeta Bandung.
Sukamto, A., Bahrani, B., & Nurvayanti, N. (2026). Tes Kemampuan Akademik (TKA) sebagai inovasi evaluasi pendidikan: Sebuah tinjauan naratif. Journal of Instructional and Development Researches. https://journal.iel-education.org/index.php/JIDeR/article/view/695
Susongko, P., Ratu, I. M., & Hayati, M. N. (2021). Tes kemampuan berfikir tingkat tinggi untuk mengukur literasi lingkungan hidup bagi siswa sekolah menengah pertama dengan aplikasi model rasch. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal). https://www.scienceedujournal.org/index.php/PSEJ/article/view/127
Suwarno, S. (2025). Integration of Psychometric Testing in Employee Recruitment and Selection to Enhance Job Fit. Journal of Management, Economic, and Accounting. http://jurnalunived.com/index.php/JMEA/article/view/1149
Tabane, L. M. (2017). Revising the Industrial Test Battery Using the Rasch Model for Measurement. search.proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/3b8e7cd276cc2aba95a46ae16907d821/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y
Tarigan, M., & Fadillah, F. (2021). Analisis item response theory Raven’s coloured progressive matrices pada sampel anak usia dini. PSIKODIMENSIA: Kajian Ilmiah Psikologi. https://journal.unika.ac.id/index.php/psi/article/view/3101
Thakur, T. (2025). Rasch measurement theory: A complete course. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=K5lIEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT25&dq=rasch+model+figural+reasoning+psychometrics+personnel+selection&ots=GIEGlfzEwr&sig=n-A0bso0uOO2l5jDk9Z8ubQh5Js
Vierula, J., Talman, K., & Hupli, M. (2021). Development and psychometric testing of Reasoning Skills test for nursing student selection: An item response theory approach. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14799
Vo, D. Van. (2020). Development of inductive reasoning in students across school grade levels. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100699
Wahlkrantz, E., & Melin, J. (2025). Fair Assessment of Logical Ability in Military Selection: A Rasch Analysis of a Paper Fold and Cut Test. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251372266
Wilson, M. (2023). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. taylorfrancis.com. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003286929
Woods, S. A., Ahmed, S., Nikolaou, I., Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. R. (2020). Personnel selection in the digital age: A review of validity and applicant reactions, and future research challenges. European Journal of work and organizational psychology, 29(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1681401
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Psikostudia : Jurnal Psikologi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.