When Machines Become Listeners: Emotional Intimacy of Human with AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v15i2.23134Keywords:
artificial intelligence, digital psychology, emotion regulation, emotional intimacy, parasocial relationship.Abstract
The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into daily life has expanded its role from technical assistance to emotional companionship among young adults. This study aims to explore subjective experiences of emotional intimacy with generative AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT. Employing an interpretive qualitative design and reflexive thematic analysis, semi-structured interviews were conducted with five participants, including university students and early-career professionals. Four primary themes emerged: AI as an emotionally safe space, the attainment of validation and psychological relief, AI’s role as a partner for cognitive reflection, and the critical awareness of its limitations and ethical risks. The findings indicate that while AI facilitates short-term emotion regulation through non-judgmental availability, users maintain a clear distinction between algorithmic empathy and authentic human connection. This research underscores the necessity of emotional digital literacy and suggests that AI should be integrated as a complementary scaffold, rather than a substitute, for professional mental health support and interpersonal relationships.
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh pergeseran fungsi kecerdasan buatan (AI) dari sekadar alat produktivitas menjadi mitra interaksi emosional di kalangan dewasa muda. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengeksplorasi pengalaman subjektif individu dalam membangun keintiman emosional dengan chatbot AI generatif seperti ChatGPT. Dengan menggunakan desain kualitatif interpretatif dan analisis tematik refleksif, wawancara semi-terstruktur dilakukan terhadap lima partisipan yang terdiri atas mahasiswa dan profesional awal karier. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi empat tema utama: AI sebagai ruang aman emosional, pencapaian validasi dan kelegaan psikologis, fungsi AI sebagai mitra refleksi kognitif, serta kesadaran kritis terhadap batasan etika dan risiko ketergantungan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun AI efektif dalam membantu regulasi emosi jangka pendek, pengguna tetap mempertahankan batasan antara hubungan artifisial dan autentik. Implikasi penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya literasi digital emosional dan integrasi AI sebagai instrumen pendukung, bukan pengganti, dalam layanan kesehatan mental dan pendidikan.
References
Darling, K. (2015). “Who’s Johnny?” Anthropomorphic Framing in Human-Robot Interaction, Integration, and Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588669
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
Gross, J. J. (1998a). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
Gross, J. J. (1998b). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation: Taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13(3), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032135
Ho, A., Hancock, J., & Miner, A. S. (2018). Psychological, Relational, and Emotional Effects of Self-Disclosure After Conversations With a Chatbot. Journal of Communication, 68(4), 712–733. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy026
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956a). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956b). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Lee, Y.-C., Yamashita, N., Huang, Y., & Fu, W. (2020). “I Hear You, I Feel You”: Encouraging Deep Self-disclosure through a Chatbot. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376175
Lucas, G. M., Gratch, J., King, A., & Morency, L.-P. (2014). It’s only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.043
Luxton, D. D., McCann, R. A., Bush, N. E., Mishkind, M. C., & Reger, G. M. (2011a). mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024485
Luxton, D. D., McCann, R. A., Bush, N. E., Mishkind, M. C., & Reger, G. M. (2011b). mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024485
Marwick, A., & boyd, danah. (2014). ‘It’s just drama’: teen perspectives on conflict and aggression in a networked era. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(9), 1187–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.901493
McStay, A. (2018a). Emotional AI: The Rise of Empathic Media. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451293
McStay, A. (2018b). Emotional AI: The Rise of Empathic Media. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451293
Naslund, J. A., Bondre, A., Torous, J., & Aschbrenner, K. A. (2020). Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 5(3), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00134-x
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000a). Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000b). Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
Qi, T., Liu, H., & Huang, Z. (2025). An assistant or A friend? The role of parasocial relationship of human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 167, 108625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108625
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Twenge, J. M., Spitzberg, B. H., & Campbell, W. K. (2019). Less in-person social interaction with peers among U.S. adolescents in the 21st century and links to loneliness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1892–1913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519836170
Vissenberg, J., d’Haenens, L., & Livingstone, S. (2022). Digital Literacy and Online Resilience as Facilitators of Young People’s Well-Being? European Psychologist, 27(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000478
Wang, Y., Liu, W., Yu, X., Li, B., & Wang, Q. (2024). The impact of virtual technology on students’ creativity: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 215, 105044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105044
Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P.-S., Cheng, M., Glaese, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., Kenton, Z., Brown, S., Hawkins, W., Stepleton, T., Biles, C., Birhane, A., Haas, J., Rimell, L., Hendricks, L. A., … Gabriel, I. (2021a). Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models. http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04359
Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., Rauh, M., Griffin, C., Uesato, J., Huang, P.-S., Cheng, M., Glaese, M., Balle, B., Kasirzadeh, A., Kenton, Z., Brown, S., Hawkins, W., Stepleton, T., Biles, C., Birhane, A., Haas, J., Rimell, L., Hendricks, L. A., … Gabriel, I. (2021b). Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models. http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04359
Weng, X., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). Instructional design and learning outcomes of intelligent computer assisted language learning: Systematic review in the field. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100117
