Keamanan Kemasyarakatan Dalam Pembangunan Kawasan Perbatasan Indonesia-Malaysia di Kalimantan Utara

Sonny Sudiar Sudiar, Andi Purnawarman Purnawarman

Abstract


This study aims to explore the societal security as a new approach of country’s border area development policy. The concept of societal security is becoming an important topic when it relates to the development of border area. Indonesia shares the borderline with Malaysia in North Kalimantan Province. However, the condition of residents in that area is marked with severe underdevelopment. Responding to the issue, Indonesian border development policy began to adopt simultaneously economic approach and environmental approach besides the traditional security approach which emphasizing military presence in the border area in order to boost the economy and increase the prosperity of the border area residents. This study is a field research (conducted at Krayan, Indonesia and Ba’kelalan, Malaysia) and qualitative approach was applied. Data obtained through participant observation and in-depth interview to several informants. Data was analyzed using descriptive method with emphasizing in data segmentation process. The result suggest that Indonesian government needs to include the societal security approach in the policy as the people who live in the border area have their unique customs and traditions (as their identity) that could be at odds with current policy. In addition, it was noticed that the adoption of societal security approach will complete the picture of North Kalimantan border area policy and could go hand in hand with other approaches as a country’s border area development program.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackleson, J. (2003). Directions in border security research. Social Science Journal, 40(4), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00069-7

Ackleson, J. (2005). Constructing security on the U.S.-Mexico border. Political Geography, 24(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.09.017

Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434268

Alexseev, M. A. (2011). Societal security, the security dilemma, and extreme anti-migrant hostility in Russia. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311406155

Bilgin, P. (2003). Individual and Societal Dimensions of Security. International Studies Review, 5(2), 203–222.

Burgess, J. P. (2016). An ethics of security. In G. Schlag, J. Junk, & C. Daase (Eds.), Transformations of Security Studies: Dialogues, Diversity and Discipline. London.

Buzan, B. (1991). People, States, and Fear: the National Problem in International Relations. https://doi.org/10.2307/40202323

Buzan, Barry., Ole Waever., Jaap de Wilde. (1998). Security: a New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

Diener, A., & Hagen, J. (2010). Borders, Identity, and Geopolitics. In A. Diener & J. Hagen (Eds.), Borderlines and Borderlands: Political Oddities at the Edge of the Nation-state. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Eilenberg, M. (2012). The confession of a timber baron: patterns of patronage on the Indonesian–Malaysian border. Identities, 19(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2012.672841

Eilenberg, M. (2014). Frontier constellations: agrarian expansion and sovereignty on the Indonesian-Malaysian border. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.885433

Eilenberg, M., & Wadley, R. L. (2009). Borderland livelihood strategies: The socio-economic significance of ethnicity in cross-border labour migration, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 50(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2009.01381.x

Floyd, R. (2007). Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security: Bringing together the Copenhagen and the Welsh Schools of security studies. Review of International Studies, 33(2), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050700753X

Hama, H. H. (2017). State Security, Societal Security, and Human Security. Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973598417706591

Herd, G. P., & Lofgren, J. (2001). “Societal Security”, the Baltic States and EU Integration. Cooperation and Conflict, 36(3), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092005

Holm, N. G. L., Lundsgaard, T. W., & Amundsen, K. (2019). Identity and Insecurity: Societal (In)security and Emergent Legal Challenges to European Identity. European Journal for Security Research, 4(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-018-0032-1

Hough, P. (2004). Understanding Global Security, New York: Routledge

Panić, B. (2009). Societal Security – Security and Identity. Carl Schmitt and Copenhagen School of Security Studies, 13, 29–38.

Paasi, A. (2005). Generations and the “development” of border studies. Geopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318563

Peraturan Badan Nasional Pengelola Perbatasan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 Tentang Rencana Induk Pengelolaan Perbatasan Negara Tahun 2015-2019.

Raźniak, P., & Winiarczyk-Raźniak, A. (2014). Influence of the Societal Security Level on Population Migrations in Poland. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.075

Roe, P. (2005). Ethnic Violence and the Societal Security Dilemma (Vol. 13). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2007.00274_8.x

Sheehan, M. (2005). International Security: An Analytical Survey. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

Theiler, T. (2003). Societal security and social psychology. Review of International Studies, 29(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503002493

Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In R. D. Lipschutz (Ed.), On Security. New York: Columbia University Press.

Wæver, O., Buzan, B., Kelstrup, M., & Lemaitre, P. (1993). Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jp.v11i2.9518

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Paradigma (JP)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Paradigma (JP)
pISSN: 2252-4266 - eISSN: 2615-3394

Organized and Published by Magister Administrasi Publik - Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Mulawarman
W : http://e-journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JParadigma/
E  : jurnal.paradigma@unmul.ac.id 

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Paradigma (JP) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License