THE EFFECT OF MUSIC PREFERENCE ON LEARNING OUTCOMES IN SOLFEGIO COURSES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v9i1.7879

Keywords:

Influence, Musical Preference, Solfegio, Quantitative

Abstract

Everyone, especially students of music education study programs, of course have different musical preferences. Preference is the tendency to choose and like certain types of music. Differences in music preferences are influenced by several factors such as the level of social class, family, environment, education, and so on. Musical preferences can have an impact on musical abilities, one of which is solfegio. This study aims to determine the effect of music preference on learning outcomes of solfegio courses in music education study programs. This study uses a quantitative method to investigate the relationship between the two variables where music preference is the independent variable (X) and the learning outcomes of solfegio courses are the dependent variable (Y). Data was collected by means of interviews and questionnaires to research subjects taken at random (random sampling). The collected data was then analyzed using the SPSS 26 application to determine the correlation coefficient (r) with the product moment formula, then hypothesis testing was carried out using the t-test to obtain a positive or negative relationship between the two variables studied

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Research Procedure: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: RinekaiCipta.

Aysia, DAY, & Palit, HC (2014). Effect of Music Preference on Mental Work Performance (Doctoral dissertation, Petra Christian University).

Azwar, S. (2003). Preparation of the Psychological Scale, Yogyakarta: Student Library.

Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: a social critique of the judgment of time. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (La Distinction, Paris: Minuit, 1979).

Djohan. (2009). Musical Emotion Response, Joglo Alit Publisher, Yogyakarta.

Gilbert, D. (2018). “It's Just the Way I Learn!”: Inclusion from the Perspective of a Student with Visual Impairment. Music Educators Journal, 105(1),21-27.

Hamzah, A. 2010. The relationship between music preference and risk taking behavior teenager. Jakarta:UIN

Husna, MN (2016). Application of the Solfeggio Method for School Level Students Junior High School (Smp) Class Vii. Journal of Educational Research, 17(1).

Kotler, Philip (2005). Marketing Management, 11th edition, Volume 2, Jakarta : Prenhalindo

Larson, S. (1993). The Value of Cognitive Models in Evaluating Solfege Systems. Indiana Theory Review,14(2), 73-116. Retrieved February 18, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24045329

Novenanto, A. (2018). Habitus: A Feeling of Place. Study Journal Socio-Cultural Space, 2(1), 153-159.

Saputra, D. N. (2021). Learning Innovation through Freedom Learning Management in Music Education Program. Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), 4(2), 43-49.

Schwartz, KD, & Fouts, GT (2003). Music preferences, personality style, and developmental issues of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(3), 205–213.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022547520656

Shaleha, RRA (2019). Do re mi: Psychology, music and culture. Bulletin psychology, 27(1), 43-51.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2013). Educational Research Methods (Approach Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D).Bandung: Alphabeta.

Sugiyono. 2013. Educational Research Methods Quantitative Approach, Qualitative, and R&D. Bandung: Alphabeta.

Utama, S. (2017). Preference for Hardcore Music in Teens in the Community Yogyakarta Hardcore (Doctoral dissertation, Indonesian Institute of the Arts Yogyakarta).

Zhukov, K. (2017). Experiential (informal/non-formal) practice does not improve sight-reading skills. Musicae Scientiae, 21(4), 418-429.

Additional Files

Published

2023-07-24