Language, Paralanguage and Kinesics in Korean Communication: A Tripartite Analytical Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v12i1.26631Keywords:
Korean-communication nonverbal-communication paralanguage kinesics multimodal-communication intercultural-pragmaticsAbstract
ABSTRACT
This study looks at how language, paralanguage and kinesics work together in Korean communication. It shows that meaning is often indirect and depends on the situation. Ferdinand Poyatos’ tripartite framework of language, paralanguage and kinesics is used to evaluate Korean interactions. This study uses a qualitative technique to examine how these communication cues function in many social and cultural situations. The results suggest that meaning in Korean communication is not only derived from language but also from the combination of verbal and nonverbal cues. The study concludes that language and non-linguistic signs work together in Korean communication, which is a multimodal and culturally ingrained system that should not be studied separately.
References
References
Abercrombie, D. (1968). Paralanguage. International Journal of Language and
Communication Disorders, 3 (1), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682826809011441
Bacon, F. (1605). The advancement of learning. London: Modern Library.
Baldry, A. & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: a multimedia toolkit and course book. London: Equinox.
Bateman, J. A. (2014). Text and image: a critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London & New York: Routledge.
Brown, L., et al. (2014). Phonetics and politeness: perceiving Korean honorific and non-honorific speech through phonetic cues. Journal of Pragmatics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.011
Brown, L. & Whitman, J. (2015). Honorifics and politeness in Korean. Korean Linguistics. 17. http://dx.doi.org/127-131. 10.1075/kl.17.2.001
Brown, L., Eunhae Ho, G. & Idemaru, K. (2025). Prosodic features of polite speech: evidence from Korean interactional data. Pragmatics, 35(3), 321-347. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23003.bro
Cho, J. & Kim, D. (2017). Strategies for communicating in Korean. Talking2Koreans. https://talktokoreans.com
Choi, S. C., & Kim, U. (2006). The Korean mind: understanding contemporary Korean culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(5), 575-589.
Cropley, A. J. (2022). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A Practice–Oriented Introduction. Germany: Editura Intalago.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behaviour: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1977). Facial action coding system: a technique for the measurement of facial movement. Consulting Psychologists.
Evason, N. (2016). Communication. South Korean - Communication — Cultural Atlas
Gibbs, G. (2007). Analysing qualitative data. London: SAGE.
Harrigan, J., R. Rosenthal, R. & Scherer, K. (2008). The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behaviour research. OUP.
Ide, S. (1999). Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8(2-3), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223
Jewitt, C. (2016). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
Jung, Y. A. & Minkyung, Y. (2016). A case study: understanding non-verbal expressions when learning Korean as a foreign language. US-China Education Review A, 6(12), 690-700.
https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2016.12.003
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006/2021). Reading images: the grammar of Visual design (3rd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2013). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (8th ed.). Wadsworth.
Lee, J. S. (2010). Korean politeness and honorifics in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2510-2525.
Merkin, R. S. (2009). Cross-cultural communication patterns: Korean and American communication. London & New York: Routledge.
Norris, S. (2020). Multimodal Theory and Methodology for the Analysis of (inter)action and Identity. London & New York: Routledge.
O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
Poyatos, F. (1983). New perspectives in nonverbal communication. Oxford: Pergamon.
Poyatos, F. (1993). Paralanguage: a linguistic and interdisciplinary approach to interactive speech and sounds. John Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.92
Poyatos, F. (1997). Nonverbal Communication Across Disciplines: Volume 1: Culture, sensory interaction, speech, conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shailaja, N. (2024). The interplay of body language and paralanguage: enhancing communication through non-verbal cues. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 13(11), 1080-1085. https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR241116122100
Sohn, H.M. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural interaction: a multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244511
Trager, G. L. (1958). Paralanguage: A first approximation. Studies in Linguistics, 13, 1–12.
Yum, J.O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communicative Monographs, 55(4), 374-388.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Every works in CaLLs is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
