Language, Paralanguage and Kinesics in Korean Communication: A Tripartite Analytical Framework

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v12i1.26631

Keywords:

Korean-communication nonverbal-communication paralanguage kinesics multimodal-communication intercultural-pragmatics

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This study looks at how language, paralanguage and kinesics work together in Korean communication. It shows that meaning is often indirect and depends on the situation. Ferdinand Poyatos’ tripartite framework of language, paralanguage and kinesics is used to evaluate Korean interactions. This study uses a qualitative technique to examine how these communication cues function in many social and cultural situations. The results suggest that meaning in Korean communication is not only derived from language but also from the combination of verbal and nonverbal cues. The study concludes that language and non-linguistic signs work together in Korean communication, which is a multimodal and culturally ingrained system that should not be studied separately.

 

Author Biography

  • Jacinta Benjamin-Ohwodede, University of Benin
    Jacinta Benjamin-Ohwodede is an academic and researcher in English language and linguistics based at the University of Benin (UniBen) in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. She holds a Ph.D. and serves as an Associate Professor of English language, phonetics and phonology, applied linguistics in the Department of English and Literature at the universit. She is the current College of Postgraduate representative for the Faculty of ARts, University of Benin. 

References

References

Abercrombie, D. (1968). Paralanguage. International Journal of Language and

Communication Disorders, 3 (1), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682826809011441

Bacon, F. (1605). The advancement of learning. London: Modern Library.

Baldry, A. & Thibault, P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis: a multimedia toolkit and course book. London: Equinox.

Bateman, J. A. (2014). Text and image: a critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London & New York: Routledge.

Brown, L., et al. (2014). Phonetics and politeness: perceiving Korean honorific and non-honorific speech through phonetic cues. Journal of Pragmatics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.011

Brown, L. & Whitman, J. (2015). Honorifics and politeness in Korean. Korean Linguistics. 17. http://dx.doi.org/127-131. 10.1075/kl.17.2.001

Brown, L., Eunhae Ho, G. & Idemaru, K. (2025). Prosodic features of polite speech: evidence from Korean interactional data. Pragmatics, 35(3), 321-347. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23003.bro

Cho, J. & Kim, D. (2017). Strategies for communicating in Korean. Talking2Koreans. https://talktokoreans.com

Choi, S. C., & Kim, U. (2006). The Korean mind: understanding contemporary Korean culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(5), 575-589.

Cropley, A. J. (2022). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A Practice–Oriented Introduction. Germany: Editura Intalago.

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behaviour: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49–98.

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1977). Facial action coding system: a technique for the measurement of facial movement. Consulting Psychologists.

Evason, N. (2016). Communication. South Korean - Communication — Cultural Atlas

Gibbs, G. (2007). Analysing qualitative data. London: SAGE.

Harrigan, J., R. Rosenthal, R. & Scherer, K. (2008). The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behaviour research. OUP.

Ide, S. (1999). Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8(2-3), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223

Jewitt, C. (2016). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.

Jung, Y. A. & Minkyung, Y. (2016). A case study: understanding non-verbal expressions when learning Korean as a foreign language. US-China Education Review A, 6(12), 690-700.

https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2016.12.003

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006/2021). Reading images: the grammar of Visual design (3rd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.

Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2013). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (8th ed.). Wadsworth.

Lee, J. S. (2010). Korean politeness and honorifics in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2510-2525.

Merkin, R. S. (2009). Cross-cultural communication patterns: Korean and American communication. London & New York: Routledge.

Norris, S. (2020). Multimodal Theory and Methodology for the Analysis of (inter)action and Identity. London & New York: Routledge.

O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. London: Continuum.

Poyatos, F. (1983). New perspectives in nonverbal communication. Oxford: Pergamon.

Poyatos, F. (1993). Paralanguage: a linguistic and interdisciplinary approach to interactive speech and sounds. John Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.92

Poyatos, F. (1997). Nonverbal Communication Across Disciplines: Volume 1: Culture, sensory interaction, speech, conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Shailaja, N. (2024). The interplay of body language and paralanguage: enhancing communication through non-verbal cues. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 13(11), 1080-1085. https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/SR241116122100

Sohn, H.M. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spencer-Oatey, H., & Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural interaction: a multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244511

Trager, G. L. (1958). Paralanguage: A first approximation. Studies in Linguistics, 13, 1–12.

Yum, J.O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communicative Monographs, 55(4), 374-388.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06

Issue

Section

Articles