PERSUASIVE POWER AS REFLECTED BY RHETORICAL STYLES IN POLITICAL SPEECHES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BARRACK OBAMA AND JOHN MCCAIN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v4i2.1360Keywords:
persuasive power, rhetorical style, rhetorical criticism, political speechAbstract
This study investigated about persuasive power and rhetorical style in Barrack Obama’s and John McCain’s speeches to answer two problems: how Barrack Obama’s and John McCain’s political speeches conveyed persuasive power as reflected in their rhetorical styles and what the differences of Barrack Obama’s political speeches from John McCain’s speeches are in terms of: persuasive power of the message conveyed and the rhetorical style from eighteen speeches during Presidential Election Campaign of United States in 2008. The researcher used rhetorical criticism as the technique in analyzing the data. The data of the present study were sentences which were considered to have persuasive power that were created by using rhetorical style. Having analyzed the data, the researcher revealed the following findings: (1) The researcher found that both Obama and John McCain used rhetorical style to convey the meaning in their speeches. Yet, they produced the rhetorical style differently in case of the time they brought into the speeches; Obama brought the future but McCain brought the past; (2) Obama had more persuasive power in his speech comparing with John McCain since he produced more frequent and more various rhetorical style.
References
Aristotle. 2007. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brummett, B. 2003. A Rhetoric of Style. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
Charteris-Black, J. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor (2nd Edition). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. New York: Longman.
Griffin, E. 2012. A First Look at Communication Theory (Eighth Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Grigsby, E. 2011. Analyzing Politics: An Introduction to Political Science (Fifth Edition). Belmont: Wardsworth Publishing.
Herbert, B. 2008. “Obama Phenomenon”. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/05/opinion/05herbert.html
McGuigan, B. 2007. Rhetorical Devices: A Handbook and Activities for Student Writers. USA: Prestwick House, Inc.
Nord, C. 2007. “Identifying Communication Function” dalam M.B Papi, G. Cappelli, & S. Masi (Eds.). Lexical Complexity: Theoretical Assesment and Translational Perspectives Pisa: Pisa University.
Nye, J. S. Jr. 2009. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Perloff, R. 2009. The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitude in the Twenty First Century (Fourth Edition). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Samuelsen, R. 2008. “Inside Obama's Rhetoric”. Retrieved from http://www.nysun.com/opinion/inside‐obamas‐rhetoric/71516/
Sauer, C. 1997. “Echoes from Abroad-Speeches for the Domestic Audience: Queen Beatrix’s Address to Israeli Parliament” dalam C. Schaffner (Ed.). Analyzing Political Speeches. Clevedon: Multilungual Matters.
Wills, C. 2008. “Big speeches a new political tool for Obama”. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/28/AR2008082800284.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Every works in CaLLs is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
